Ἐκπερᾶναι

Notes

1. Entry lacking, Adler reports, in mss GTFV, a marginal addition in A, and placed earlier in G.
   Since the headword is the aorist active infinitive of the verb e)kperai/nw , the gloss is obviously a mismatch for it. A possible explanation is that e)kpera=nai, like pera=nai (pi 1030), is unglossed, leaving e)pepo/nhtai as another unglossed entry (albeit slightly out of alphabetical order) in its own right. The latter might be quoted from Xenophon, Cyropaedia 8.2.5, though there are other possibilities.