Πρώρα
prow
Translated by William Hutton4 Oct 2013Vetting: high5 revisions
Translation
Greek original · Adler’s text
Πρώρα· τὸ ἔμπροσθεν τῆς νεώς. καὶ Πρώραθεν. καὶ Πρωράτας τῆς νηός· καὶ Πρωρεύς.
Betacode
*prw/ra: to\ e)/mprosqen th=s new/s. kai\ *prw/raqen. kai\ *prwra/tas th=s nho/s: kai\ *prwreu/s.
Notes (4)
- This entry consists of a collection of remarks on the word for "prow" (spelled both
prw/ra as here andprw/|ra ), and words derived from it. - 1cf. John Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle's Physics 16.314, scholia to Aristeides, Panathenaicus 113.9, and to Oppian, Halieutica 192; also Hesychius pi4150, which Latte connects with commentary on Acts 27:41 and/or Aeschylus, Seven against Thebes 208 (where forms of the headword appear), though the reason for singling out these citations is unclear. ↩
- 2A single word in the Greek, untranslatable as such into English, combining the headword with the ablative suffix
-qen. Evidently quoted from somewhere; the possibilities include Pindar and Thucydides. ↩ - 3Adler's typography here shows that she confined this supplementary lemma to the single word 'prow-men'. However, that all three words make up a quotation here (source unidentifiable), is indicated by use of the epic dialect form
nho/s ('of the ship'); contrast the Attic/Koine formnew/s in the first sentence of the entry. Here the lemma appears to be a noun in the accusative plural from the stem of the headword with the agentive suffix-ths . This form of the noun is otherwise attested only at epsilon 2518, where it occurs in what has been identified as a fragment of Arrian's Parthica, fr. 59.5 Roos-Wirth (= FGrH 156 F146), but the presence of the poetic formnho/s guarantees that we are dealing with a different source. It is also possible that the word here is a nominative singular form of the word in Doric dialect (perhaps extracted from a lost tragic chorus or the like). ↩ - 4Adler's presentation of this fourth term is ambiguous. Is it a gloss for 'prow-men' (as suggested by the colon between the two phrases) or is it a separate lemma (as suggested by the capitalization of 'prow-officer'? If the former, then it might incline one to the option that
prwra/tas in the preceding phrase is a singular Doric nominative (see previous note), since this word is definitely nominative singular. In any eventprwreu/s is a more common word thanprwra/ths for an officer in charge of the prow of a ship, and is also formed from the stem of the primary headword with an agentive suffix (this time-eus ). On these two terms Adler compares Lexicon Ambrosianum 1133 and 1122 respectively. ↩
Neighbouring entries
Revision history5 revisions · last 10 Dec 2021
- coding — Catharine Roth
- Revised — David Whitehead
- Split note 3 into notes 3 and 4, tweaked both resulting notes — William Hutton
- tweaked and expanded notes; cosmetics — David Whitehead
- coding, status — Catharine Roth
- Translated — William Hutton